Jump to content

500系 Shinkansen retirement


Shinkansenrailfan

Recommended Posts

Shinkansenrailfan

Hi all, recently I came across an article about Kyoto's JR West museum. I couldn't read Japanese well but from the numbers and Kanji , I thought I saw the report talking about the 500系 Shinkansen's retirement in Spring 2016.

 

I'm not very sure of what I've seen. But I'm sure they said mentioned the words 「500系新幹線」and 引退 in it.

 

As I don't have other sources to look into , or read Japanese fluently , I would need help is asking for the actual retirement timing of the 500系 Shinkansen. I'm unable to catch it this year so hopefully I am able to next year.

Link to comment

I'd think that's highly unlikely considering they were only refurbished a few years ago.

 

From what I've read about this it's just the railway museum opening in Spring 2016 and they are going to showcase the 500 because of it's speed etc.

 

Anyone else shed any light on this?

Link to comment

Shinkansenrailfan, do you still have the link? I looked at the English and Japanese wikipedia articles, I don't see anything about the full retirement of the series. As gr-ex wrote, JR West's new museum will open around that time.

Link to comment
Shinkansenrailfan

I'd think that's highly unlikely considering they were only refurbished a few years ago.

 

From what I've read about this it's just the railway museum opening in Spring 2016 and they are going to showcase the 500 because of it's speed etc.

 

Anyone else shed any light on this?

Shinkansen trains usually lasts up to 20 years. I do foresee their retirement latest by 2017.

Link to comment
Shinkansenrailfan

Shinkansenrailfan, do you still have the link? I looked at the English and Japanese wikipedia articles, I don't see anything about the full retirement of the series. As gr-ex wrote, JR West's new museum will open around that time.

Its not an internet link. I found the source from a report from the magazine Diamond Weekly for 2014 9/20. There is a special report on the JR West's opening of the museum.

Link to comment

I do think the 500 Series will retire by 2017 at very latest, mostly because of their unique body design. The 700-7000 Hikari Rail Star trainsets could probably continue operating until 2020, thanks to the fact there are plentiful spare parts for that trainset.

Link to comment

 
参考資料 あくまでメモ程度と思ってください。
・新幹線の全般検査は、120万キロ以内、もしくは36ヶ月以内に行う事が省令で定められている。

 

編成名                V編成改造日               全検出場日                   全般検査期限                   備考
 
V2                      2009.01.14                 2012.01.16                  2015.01.15
 
V3                      2008.03.28                 2014.01.19                  2017.01.18                       カンセンジャーラッピング
 
V4                       2008.10.27                 2011.10.17                  2014.10.16

 

V5                       2008.05.20                 2014.04.16                  2017.04.15

 

V6                       2008.09.02                 2011.11.26                  2014.11.25

 

V7                       2010.05.10                 2012.08.22                  2015.08.21

 

V8                       2010.06.29                  2013.01.??                 2016.01.??
 
V9                      2010.02.24                   2012.05.15                 2015.05.14

 

i found this

i think is the dates of inspection 1.200.000KM or 36 months

 

maybe the retirement will be close of those dates

Edited by NuclearErick
  • Like 1
Link to comment

Sorry mudkip, a 500 series is way to advanced technology and too fast for us to use in the states...

 

Jeff

 

Actually, according to the Texas Central Railway proposal, they will be using the 700-I trainset, essentially an N700A trainset geared to run as fast 330 km/h (205 mph). That's faster than the 500 Series trainset, which had a speed limit of 300 km/h (186 mph).

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Actually, according to the Texas Central Railway proposal, they will be using the 700-I trainset, essentially an N700A trainset geared to run as fast 330 km/h (205 mph). That's faster than the 500 Series trainset, which had a speed limit of 300 km/h (186 mph).

 

Exactly.

 

You cascade one or two 500s to TXC and use them on College Station stopping services during parts of the day where there's sufficient demand for a HOU-DAL express. This is of course presuming that the HSR College Station is laid out to allow overtaking... which I certainly hope it is, seeing as how JRC is supposed to be doing a decent chunk of the engineering work.

Link to comment

Considering the 500 series is an old train by modern japanese standards that has very little luggage, head and legroom even for japanese people and most of the cars are already scrapped, then using a more spacious and fully standardised modern stock on the Texas HSR would be cheaper to operate and better for the travellers.

 

A while ago i was thinking about the possibility of using japanese trains in Hungary, since the shinkansen network is fully compatible with the Hungarian standard electrified network (from an electric, track and loading gauge standpoint) and only the ATC boxes have to be swapped, but the shinkansens use high platforms, while all Hungarian stations have low platforms (execpt 75% of the metro lines) and the cost of shipping and maintaining the Japanese trains here would be much higher than building new trains locally.

 

For american general HSR, i think Amtrak is doing it right. They bought a bunch of high power, high speed electric locomotives that can be used with standard high speed coaches and also allow high speed freight. If more power is required, the locomotives support multiple working, so more than one could be used on a train. Not to mention the fact, that they are allowed to operate on non grade separated lines, which is a cheap way to get HSR on already existing routes.

 

So, i think while it would be funny and great to have Japanese used stock in Europe or in the USA, it's not financially viable.

Link to comment

Amtrak's way makes sense in the NEC and its logical extensions. (e.g. Portland, Maine to Atlanta, GA and possibly FL).

 

However, out hurr in the west, the infrastructure was never as beefy as the east... no four-track Pennsy-style mains... and the freight traffic is actually heavier, since the general tendency over the last 250 years has been for the American population center to move west and south. The existing lines into and out of cities like Houston, Denver, Fort Worth, and others are packed with freight. So too LA, but LA benefits from Metrolink having gotten a foothold during the doldrums of the 70's and 80's.

 

Such a system could never be implemented today, which is why Denver is constructing all new track in existing corridors, whether it's LRT (South) or SEPTA-spec EMU (East, North). Houston may also go this route if the Missouri City LRT extension is approved... that was envisioned as commuter rail 20 years ago, but there's no room left on the UP and the cost of building additional tracks for a recalcitrant private entity isn't much cheaper than new-alignment LRT owned outright.

 

TxC's plan makes the most sense here - new tracks independent of the legacy rail network, its congestion and FRA regs.

  • Like 1
Link to comment

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...