keitaro Posted June 27, 2014 Share Posted June 27, 2014 but the 500系 is just so damn awesome. Still love my limited tomix model. and the front of the 500 is bad ass. Link to comment
cteno4 Posted June 28, 2014 Share Posted June 28, 2014 Damn close the old F104 starfighter! Jeff Link to comment
Guest ___ Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alexander_Neumeister Link to comment
cteno4 Posted June 30, 2014 Share Posted June 30, 2014 The origional engineering designs for the radical shape changes came out of Eiji Nakatsu's work at jr west. I believe neumeister did the fiancé design, but the basic shapes had already been set. http://www.greenbiz.com/blog/2012/10/19/how-one-engineers-birdwatching-made-japans-bullet-train-better?page=0%2C0 http://www.asknature.org/product/6273d963ef015b98f641fc2b67992a5e Jeff Link to comment
Sacto1985 Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 (edited) While the shape of the 500 Series Shinkansen allowed it to reach 300 km/h, it unfortunately resulted in a somewhat round cabin cross section that felt too much like sitting in an airliner. That's why 700 Series Shinkansen--which was designed at the behest of JR Central--won out in the longer term because the duckbill nose design did the same noise and aerodynamic improvements as the 500 Series but allowed for a larger and roomier "square" cabin cross section. But getting back on topic, :) I still think Niigata Transys will get the contract for a new DMU for the northern Tōhoku JR East lines. It will probably be based on the KiHa 120, if Niigata Transys could restart that production line. Edited July 1, 2014 by Sacto1985 Link to comment
Mudkip Orange Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 Doesn't the square X-sect also reduce tunnel boom compared to the cylinder? Link to comment
kvp Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 Doesn't the square X-sect also reduce tunnel boom compared to the cylinder? No, actually it increases it. The tunnel boom is caused by the piston effect and the less space remains between the train and the tunnel wall, the worse it gets. The 500 series had a nice small cross section, so lot's of space for the air to go around the train. This made the interior of the train too tight as a side effect. In europe the solution was to modifiy the tunnel entries to compensate the pressure differences through vents and sometimes even with powered fans and they also made the tunnels much wider than the trains. In japan the special front of the really high speed trains redirect this sound of the shockwave upwards and also make the transition more gradual. Also, in Europe many new lines and tunnels are located far from residential areas, so they are less of a problem. Newer shinkansen lines are also moved as far away from important residential areas as possible, just compare the location of the Tokyo station shinkansen terminal to Shin Aomori or Shin Hakodate. The japanese solution with these special fronts are great, but upgrading all lines and tunnels would have been a better but much more expensive solution. Link to comment
cteno4 Posted July 1, 2014 Share Posted July 1, 2014 Th 500 was the first big attempt at doing the tunnel noise reduction. 700 duckbill was designed with a lot of computer modeling to keep the spacious square x section but keep down the tunnel boom. With increased speeds you end up with more and more dramatic duckbills to break the pressure interfaces w/o making them go bang to badly. Jeff Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now