miyakoji Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 I'm not having any luck reading between the lines. Is this good or bad? Link to comment
kvp Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 This might or might not suggest someone having inside information. It could be speculation from both the seller's and the buyer's side. The exact value of the transaction and the estimated buyout value in case the terminal is built there could help, but it will remain speculation until the actual locatation and land values are known. (if the latter ever becomes public) Link to comment
Mudkip Orange Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 I'm crossing my fingers that it's a front for Texas Central, but it could just as easily be a speculator who's looking to flip it to TCR once the EIS comes out. Meanwhile, my understanding is the mayor and other officials are pushing to get it all the way Downtown. Link to comment
ozman2009 Posted April 21, 2015 Share Posted April 21, 2015 "All the way downtown" would be good. One of the good things about train travel in Europe is that it can be from CBD to CBD - eg the Eurostar from Paris to London. Link to comment
bikkuri bahn Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 (edited) Downtown (or close to it with good transit connections) should be the final goal, but a private venture like this is about maximizing cost performance/shareholder value. Which, given the conditions of sunbelt sprawl cities, means first building a terminus with good road connections to the business centers (not necessarily downtown, could be suburban business parks)- this will likely mean a relatively large greenfield or greyfield location such as the parcel reported about above. Edited April 22, 2015 by bikkuri bahn Link to comment
Mudkip Orange Posted April 22, 2015 Share Posted April 22, 2015 What bikkuri said. Houston sprawls so much that the weighted centroid of white collar employment is likely slightly to the *west* of the Northwest Mall, e.g. further away from Downtown. The "Energy Corridor" - which contains about a third of the oil, gas, and engineering firms - is, at 22 miles, further from Downtown Houston than Yokohama is from Tokyo Station. Link to comment
bikkuri bahn Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 FRA Alignment Alternatives Analysis Report. Interesting reading. https://www.fra.dot.gov/eLib/Details/L17203 Some snippets: 5.1.2 Design GuidelinesTCR developed alignment design guidelines based on their engineering judgment and professionalexperience. The guidelines focused on alignment curvature, profile gradient, and constructabilityconsiderations. These are requirements all potential route alternatives must meet to be consideredfeasible. The general design guidelines, used by FRA in its Level I Screening, are: Maximum Operating Speed: a desired maximum operating speed of 205 mph (330 kilometersper hour (km/h)) was chosen to be consisted with N700‐I Tokaido Shinkansen technology. Thealignment was designed to provide for maximum operating speeds throughout to the extentpractical, but in some locations alignment curvature to minimize property and environmentalimpacts would restrict speeds. Separation from Existing Freight Rail Lines: the proposed HSR system would not operate on anyexisting freight rail lines. It is expected that reconfiguration of existing freight lines in selectlocations may be required to support construction and operations of the HSR system. Alignment Curvature: a desired minimum radius of 17,000 feet (5,200 meters) was used fordevelopment of the preliminary alignments. This minimum radius curve would allow foroperations at 205 mph (330 km/h) using the maximum permissible cant (actual superelevation)of 7 inches (175 millimeters). Maximum Grade: the desired maximum grade was set at 1.5 percent Special Trackwork: for the design of the trackwork at the approaches to stations, where alltrains would stop, an assumption of 31 mph (50 km/h) special trackwork components was usedto establish the footprint of the station approach limits Recommended Minimum Offset between HSR and Utility ROW: a 165‐foot (50 meter) offsetwas established as the minimum separation distance from the centerline of the electricaltransmission line corridor to the centerline of the HSR corridor. This was determined by takingapproximately half of the minimum assumed transmission line ROW width of 215 feet (65meters) for an electrical transmission line corridor and adding it to half of the assumed 100 feet(30 meters) minimum high‐speed rail ROW width. Also check out cross sections of the line (at grade, fill, and elevated) on pages 8/9 1 Link to comment
Mudkip Orange Posted November 12, 2015 Share Posted November 12, 2015 Actual engineering schematics always make a project more believable than pretty pictures and lines on maps. Link to comment
bikkuri bahn Posted May 19, 2016 Share Posted May 19, 2016 The operator of a Japanese high-speed train line plans to open a Dallas office to support a local company’s plans for a controversial bullet train connecting North Texas and Houston. The Dallas Regional Chamber announced Thursday afternoon that Central Japan Railway Co. will station about 20 employees in Dallas. The company’s technical and operations experts will help privately-backed Texas Central Partners with the development of what could be America’s first high-speed rail line. Texas Central plans to use the same train and rail technology that Central Japan uses on its Tokaido Shinkansen line that connects Tokyo, Nagoya and Osaka. http://transportationblog.dallasnews.com/2016/05/japanese-bullet-train-operator-opening-office-in-dallas-to-assist-texas-high-speed-rail.html/ Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now