Mudkip Orange Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 If you look at rural stations like the one towards the end of this video, you'll note that while the underlying platform is long - say, 16+ carlengths - and has a lower height, with a shorter raised section that's designer around the shorter/regional trains of today - say, 8 carlengths. Seeing as how the Japanese have always been keen on standardization, when did this height change? You see it all over the old stations of the country and the provincial cities. Link to comment
KenS Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 Good question. I have no clue what the answer is. The raised section was clearly added above the original platform (in the video you can see the edge of the old top at the same height as the top of the lower section, underneath the new top). I'd guess the reason to have both was to allow both kinds of trains to operate for some period. I've never seen this kind of platform height difference in an urban Tokyo station (the kind I mostly look at photos of), so perhaps it was limited to loco-hauled stock or early DMUs. Link to comment
to2leo Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 I am guessing this but I think the platform height change might be started when JR decides to use DMUs and EMUs since the motor needs to fit below the floor. It might also due to easy embarking and disembarking and increasing wealth to do high platforms. Link to comment
bikkuri bahn Posted September 22, 2010 Share Posted September 22, 2010 Back when most trains were loco-hauled (especially outside of the big conurbations), the platform heights above the rail level were 760mm. With the widespread use of commuter and suburban EMUs, the platform height was raised to 1100mm on those station platforms served exclusively by such trains. For those platforms served by loco hauled trains, DMU's and certain ltd. express stock with single steps, as well as aforementioned commuter stock, an intermediate height of 920mm is the standard. Likely, as 2leo mentioned, the EMUs require the higher platform due to the floor levels being higher to accommodate the underfloor electrical equipment. Also, the EMUs have no steps to speed passenger boarding and thus reduce station dwell time. That said, it seems some (at least to my eyes) of the newer EMU units used in Tohoku have lower floors to reduce the height gap when using those lower platforms common on the rural stations. Link to comment
marknewton Posted September 23, 2010 Share Posted September 23, 2010 That's some useful information on platform heights, BB - thanks! Cheers, Mark. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now