MangakaRailfan Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 Alright.... Is there any way to ease my tight curves with straight pieces so I can run bigger locomotives? Link to comment
bill937ca Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 Which curves are you using? Link to comment
Giugiaro Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 Oh dear... That is Pocket Line track. That 150mm radius is much smaller than the currently accepted 280mm radius for most modern rolling stock. 1 Link to comment
railsquid Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 48 minutes ago, MangakaRailfan said: Alright.... Is there any way to ease my tight curves with straight pieces so I can run bigger locomotives? Define "bigger locomotives". There are certainly some Tomix locos which are happy with quite small radiuses, e.g. ED75: Link to comment
Cat Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 A proper easement spirals in gradually to the tightest radius in the curve. It provides a smoother transition so the cars don't look so jerky entering the corner. The best way to cheat if you have the space is to use a short piece of a wider radius at each end of the curve, a 15º segment of the next larger radius will do. Link to comment
bill937ca Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 5 hours ago, MangakaRailfan said: Kato R150 Its called R216, R249, R282. R150 is tram track. Can't run a Big Boy on R150. Maybe it's time to take up knitting. Link to comment
cteno4 Posted June 10, 2022 Share Posted June 10, 2022 Breaking up tight radius like r150 with short straights I doubt would do much and just expand your radius when just using the next radius up of r183 might give much better and smoother results and take up the same space. It’s going to look jerky going back and forth from straight to curve and this is the transition from straight to a sharp curve that can at time cause derailment and decoupling issues (hence why larger radius transitions into tighter curve look and perform better than hitting a tight curve right off straight). As squid notes, many locos and even larger cars can navigate tight radius track, but it can look pretty bad and may have performance issues, so why the usual larger radius suggested track from the manufacturer than what it might be able to squeak out. as you lower the curve radius you also tend to have increased sensitivity to things like the track not being all level or track joints not being smooth due to any imperfections on track ends and/or tweaked joiners. best get a few radii and play some before jumping int9 an big purchases. cheers jeff Link to comment
MangakaRailfan Posted June 10, 2022 Author Share Posted June 10, 2022 (edited) Quote Whoops! I believe it's actually R183! Edited June 10, 2022 by MangakaRailfan Link to comment
MangakaRailfan Posted June 10, 2022 Author Share Posted June 10, 2022 (edited) 12 minutes ago, cteno4 said: 12 minutes ago, cteno4 said: Breaking up tight radius like r150 with short straights I doubt would do much and just expand your radius when just using the next radius up of r183 might give much better and smoother results and take up the same space. It’s going to look jerky going back and forth from straight to curve and this is the transition from straight to a sharp curve that can at time cause derailment and decoupling issues (hence why larger radius transitions into tighter curve look and perform better than hitting a tight curve right off straight). As squid notes, many locos and even larger cars can navigate tight radius track, but it can look pretty bad and may have performance issues, so why the usual larger radius suggested track from the manufacturer than what it might be able to squeak out. as you lower the curve radius you also tend to have increased sensitivity to things like the track not being all level or track joints not being smooth due to any imperfections on track ends and/or tweaked joiners. best get a few radii and play some before jumping int9 an big purchases. cheers jeff Whoops! IT'S ACTUALLY R183! I must've read the wrong lettering! Edited June 10, 2022 by MangakaRailfan Link to comment
MangakaRailfan Posted June 11, 2022 Author Share Posted June 11, 2022 Possibly. Althought i'm probably modelling the choshi electric railway, so I don't think it would be a problem. Link to comment
MangakaRailfan Posted June 11, 2022 Author Share Posted June 11, 2022 (edited) 52 minutes ago, katoftw said: Use R216 or R249 instead? Probably not a problem. I'm modelling the Choshi electric railway in the 50s-60s, so it probably won't be a problem. Edited June 11, 2022 by MangakaRailfan Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now