miyakoji Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 We would have to know the braking effort too, but anyway the outcome of the event tells us that it was not sufficient to hold the train on the grade. Makes me wish I could remember physics class better 🙂, I did enjoy it. Would 1 in 66 be 15 permil? Link to comment
Sheffie Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 The calculation for weight is as follows. A 1 in 66 gradient is an actual angle of asin(1/66) or 0.868 degrees. (Assuming I understand railway gradient correctly, as the ratio of increase in height to distance along the rail, not horizontal distance.) The component of the train's weight acting down the slope would be sin(0.868), or 1/66 again. Link to comment
katoftw Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 100 handbrakes applied in under 60 minutes. Folks! Tell him he's dreaming. 1 Link to comment
cteno4 Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 Mark is the one who knows, he’s done this stuff! jeff Link to comment
katoftw Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 (edited) Mark also stated 100 in 60 mins or less was unlikely. And he would know, as jeff informs. Edited March 21, 2019 by katoftw Link to comment
cteno4 Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 Lots of unknowns here as well so it’s doing a lot of assumption to try to get any answer, and thus likely flawed. jeff Link to comment
ben_issacs Posted March 21, 2019 Author Share Posted March 21, 2019 steffie, Train weight 42,500 tons, grade 1:66, divide 42,500 by 66, answer about 650 tons, which is the gravitational force pulling the train down the grade. And this is the force which the handbrakes must resist to hold the train. Anyrate, how many handbrakes were applied, and we can only speculate on this number, there weren't enough to hold the train. We must await the full report for further details. Regards, Bill, Melbourne. Link to comment
cteno4 Posted March 21, 2019 Share Posted March 21, 2019 Also the combined frictional force of rolling resistance would add to brake side of the equation. Again unknowns. jeff Link to comment
ben_issacs Posted March 22, 2019 Author Share Posted March 22, 2019 Folks, From Mark's shot of an iron ore car, they have roller bearing axle boxes, so rolling friction would be pretty low. Regards, Bill, Melbourne. Link to comment
ben_issacs Posted March 26, 2019 Author Share Posted March 26, 2019 Miyakoji, To convert 1:60 into per cent or per mille, , just divide 100 or 1000 by 60. Regards, Bill, Melbourne. Link to comment
ben_issacs Posted April 24, 2019 Author Share Posted April 24, 2019 Folks, More info is now available on the ATSB web site, giving details of the action that the driver took, amongst other things, But the final report looks to be still a long way off! Regards, Bill, Melbourne. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now