willele Posted May 19, 2018 Share Posted May 19, 2018 Hello to evertybody!! A few days ago this article appeared .. I wanted to know what you think! Thank you to all! https://www.asahi.com/articles/ASL574RZRL57PLFA00T.html Link to comment
bill937ca Posted May 19, 2018 Share Posted May 19, 2018 Only available to paid subscribers. Link to comment
willele Posted May 19, 2018 Author Share Posted May 19, 2018 but from the first words we understand that JR Tokai was not happy there was this train!! Link to comment
cteno4 Posted May 19, 2018 Share Posted May 19, 2018 Sorry it’s showing up as an invalid link here jeff Link to comment
railsquid Posted May 19, 2018 Share Posted May 19, 2018 Works for me. Basic tenor of the visible part of the article is that despite being the fastest Shinkansen ever (at the time), the 500 series lasted the shortest time of any series on the Tokaido Shinkansen. I think it's fairly well-known that it was not all that practical due to the rounded body shape restricting seating capacity, and JR Tokai never really liked it as it was a JR West design. Link to comment
chadbag Posted May 19, 2018 Share Posted May 19, 2018 (edited) I also heard that while it was the fastest, that was only on straight track. It had to slow down more than other Shinkansen on curved track. ETA: FWIW the link comes up for me Edited May 19, 2018 by chadbag Link to comment
bill937ca Posted May 19, 2018 Share Posted May 19, 2018 At the time it was removed from the Tokaido Shinkansen, it was pointed out that if a Series 500 had to replace another type of Shinkansen passengers with reserved seats lost their seats due the smaller seating capacity of the Series 500 in the nose and seats by the rounded sides were more cramped reducing passenger comfort. There were only 9 of these trains as they cost so much to build that production moved to newer, more practical designs very early. Link to comment
Sacto1985 Posted May 20, 2018 Share Posted May 20, 2018 The high production cost of the 500 Series was why JR Central ordered the 700 Series in the late 1990's, which was almost as fast as the 500 Series but with way more passenger comfort. Link to comment
willele Posted May 20, 2018 Author Share Posted May 20, 2018 For me are just JR tokai excuses!! If you would have produced 50 trains instead of 9 would have cost a lot less!! Link to comment
cteno4 Posted May 21, 2018 Share Posted May 21, 2018 Not excuses, it just was not financially practical for a number of the above reasons. Building 50 would not have significantly reduced costs and the other issues would not go away. It was a cramped train to ride I’ve ridden it and tiny overhead space. Reduced seating will always make it more expensive to run. 700 tackled all these issues quickly and better nose noise reductions. jeff 1 Link to comment
Socimi Posted May 24, 2018 Share Posted May 24, 2018 2 hours ago, willele said: Point of wiew!! facts. 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now