bill937ca Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 (edited) Ontario Premier Kathleen Wynne today announced a plan for high speed rail between Toronto and London, Ontario with stops at Pearson Airport, Guelph, Kitchener-Waterloo, and London. First phase is an environmental assessment which will take four years and cost $15 million. http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/kitchener-waterloo/wynne-ontario-high-speed-rail-report-1.4123183 http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/high-speed-rail-in-ontario-finally-not-so-fast-1.4123920 High Speed Rail report http://www.mto.gov.on.ca/english/publications/high-speed-rail-in-ontario-final-report/ Edited May 20, 2017 by bill937ca Link to comment
keiichi77 Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 I would love to see this happen, it makes sense in the Toronto Windsor corridor but unfortunately Canada is behind the rest of the modern world when it comes to railways. There is almost no political will in this country to invest large sums of money in upgrading existing rail lines let alone build new higher speed ones. :( 1 Link to comment
kvp Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 These are relatively small towns with high amounts of suburbian areas with not much local transit and relatively low amount of intercity commuters. Those who commute usually have to do it by car as going to and from the station would take longer than going to the destination directly by car. This is one case where a new high speed rail line doesn't seem useful and getting a few faster interregional trains might be the max. of what is viable. Link to comment
railsquid Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 It'll be a bit of a job to tunnel under the Atlantic... Oh, not *the* London ;) 7 Link to comment
serotta1972 Posted May 20, 2017 Share Posted May 20, 2017 It'll be a bit of a job to tunnel under the Atlantic... Oh, not *the* London ;) I had the same initial reaction - tunnel or bridge over the Atlantic. :) Link to comment
Nick_Burman Posted May 22, 2017 Share Posted May 22, 2017 These are relatively small towns with high amounts of suburbian areas with not much local transit and relatively low amount of intercity commuters. Those who commute usually have to do it by car as going to and from the station would take longer than going to the destination directly by car. This is one case where a new high speed rail line doesn't seem useful and getting a few faster interregional trains might be the max. of what is viable. The case for a "ausbaustrecke" rebuilding of existing lines instead of building a full-blown high-speed railway. Cheers NB 1 Link to comment
Pashina12 Posted May 23, 2017 Share Posted May 23, 2017 Windsor-Toronto-Ottawa/Montreal will make sense, over the longer term. There's only two others in Canada that can/do make sense - Edmonton-Calgary, and Vancouver-Seattle-Portland (and on southwards perhaps?), which are both also being discussed. Link to comment
trainsforever8 Posted June 21, 2017 Share Posted June 21, 2017 I can only hope that they will actually build it. We don't have any high speed rail in Canada and VIA Rail's service could be much better than what it currently is.. Link to comment
Socimi Posted June 23, 2017 Share Posted June 23, 2017 The case for a "ausbaustrecke" rebuilding of existing lines instead of building a full-blown high-speed railway. In the meantime just buy a good med/hi-speed (possibly tilting) multiple unit, following the example of the australian XPT and our italian ET450 "Pendolino". Link to comment
Davo Dentetsu Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 In the meantime just buy a good med/hi-speed (possibly tilting) multiple unit, following the example of the australian XPT and our italian ET450 "Pendolino". Let's not follow the example of the XPT, it's a bit of a shambles Link to comment
railsquid Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 Let's not follow the example of the XPT, it's a bit of a shambles Instead follow the British example of electrifying Brunel's Great Western Main Line (last bastion of the HSTs, from which the XPT derives), which is a total shambles partly due to important historical records being destroyed when the route was privatised, meaning you end up purchasing expensive bi-modal diesel/AC-electric trains from Japan because the electrification won't be finished in the foreseeable future so you need the diesels to bridge the gap, except they're nowhere near powerful enough to match the original timing of the HSTs on the hilly bits where the wires won't reach. Apparently. 1 Link to comment
Nick_Burman Posted June 24, 2017 Share Posted June 24, 2017 In the meantime just buy a good med/hi-speed (possibly tilting) multiple unit, following the example of the australian XPT and our italian ET450 "Pendolino". Yes...but the need for an "ausbaustrecke" rebuild would still remain. Several years ago I rode VIA Montreal - Quebec and back. The train was composed of a Bombardier diesel (noisy beasts!) + tilting coaches. Where possible the train really flew...however in many sections the train had to be kept down due to the sheer number of crossings, we literally blared "Q" all the way from the outskirts of Montreal to Quebec City. Were VIA to remove the crossings and improve track and signalling they could lop off quite a few minutes off the run... Cheers NB Link to comment
Davo Dentetsu Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Instead follow the British example of electrifying Brunel's Great Western Main Line (last bastion of the HSTs, from which the XPT derives), which is a total shambles partly due to important historical records being destroyed when the route was privatised, meaning you end up purchasing expensive bi-modal diesel/AC-electric trains from Japan because the electrification won't be finished in the foreseeable future so you need the diesels to bridge the gap, except they're nowhere near powerful enough to match the original timing of the HSTs on the hilly bits where the wires won't reach. Apparently. At least it's not negated by poor speed limits and reliability, which is kind of the game in the high speed world. That's where the XPT fails big time. Link to comment
dabsan Posted June 25, 2017 Share Posted June 25, 2017 Instead follow the British example of electrifying Brunel's Great Western Main Line (last bastion of the HSTs, from which the XPT derives), which is a total shambles partly due to important historical records being destroyed when the route was privatised, meaning you end up purchasing expensive bi-modal diesel/AC-electric trains from Japan because the electrification won't be finished in the foreseeable future so you need the diesels to bridge the gap, except they're nowhere near powerful enough to match the original timing of the HSTs on the hilly bits where the wires won't reach. Apparently. Not exactly the last bastion of the HSTs, they are used on the Midland Main Line too (East Midlands Trains) from the Midlands to London St Pancras International. :) 1 Link to comment
Davo Dentetsu Posted June 26, 2017 Share Posted June 26, 2017 Not exactly the last bastion of the HSTs, they are used on the Midland Main Line too (East Midlands Trains) from the Midlands to London St Pancras International. :) Ooh, plus ScotRail get some for the first time ever shortly. How exciting for them! :D 1 Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now