bill937ca Posted October 20, 2016 Share Posted October 20, 2016 This is a fabulous 3-rail O gauge layout themed on the Pennsylvania Railway in the 40s and 50s. 1 Link to comment
miyakoji Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 I don't know what that 2-10-0(?) is in the third video, but I'd like to see the real thing get around that radius Link to comment
marknewton Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 It's a model of an I-1s 2-10-0. I'm sure the real loco could get around a curve like that. With a lot of assistance from the re-railing gang! :) Cheers, Mark. 2 Link to comment
kvp Posted October 22, 2016 Share Posted October 22, 2016 (edited) According to its datasheet: http://www.steamlocomotive.com/decapod/?page=prr "Of the five sets of drivers, only the first and last had flanges, which reduced the design's minimum curve radius." I think that would make it a 2 axle loco on really tight curves, so if the rails could hold the axle load... Edited October 22, 2016 by kvp 1 Link to comment
marknewton Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 (edited) I've seen a series of photos showing an I1 being rerailed on the PRR Elmira branch. It derailed after the track spread and the rails rolled under it on a sharp curve. Hence my comment about the rerailing gang. The I1s were designed before the development of lateral motion devices,,which is why they had flangeless wheels. Later US designs used lateral motion devices on the leading and trailing coupled axles to reduce the rigid wheelbase. Cheers, Mark. Edited October 23, 2016 by marknewton 1 Link to comment
kvp Posted October 23, 2016 Share Posted October 23, 2016 Yes, the next 5 coupled axle type had moving axles on the outer two and no rims on the middle one instead of no rims on the middle three. The middle axle on the i1 had the tendency to move off from above the rails, putting increased load on the tracks through the other 4 and a nice side kick in the railhead when going back on the rail. In the worst case only 2 axles remain and that means 250% axle load and 2/5th traction, which makes wheelslip very likely. Still it's a nice, simple and strong locomotive. Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now