Jump to content

Bandai B-Train Shorty


Welshbloke

Recommended Posts

lukewang01
On 4/30/2021 at 5:15 PM, kami_illy said:

 

I used the old draw bars that i still had from older sets. They don't have any decorational elements but are shorter than the newer ones. Also I used the old chassis which have the pins for the couplers / draw bars on the bogeys and not on the car bodies (that makes it easier to convert them later). 

What wheels are you using to go with the older chassis? I want to reuse some of those chassis and be able to put bogie sides on them.

Link to post
Dinosbacsi

Decided to try swapping the roofs on my 103 series to the not air-conditioned ones. Mainly because I don't get these other ones, why do they have two AC units on the roof, opposed to the usually only one in the middle?

ABeVvny.jpg

Can't decide yet which one looks better. It looks a bit too plain without the AC unit on the roof, but I don't think these double-AC units are prototypical to the Chuo-Sobu line, are they? Which route may have had their 103s like this?

Link to post
bill937ca
railsquid

I'm not an expert but I think the distributed A/C arrangement is usually associated with units modified by JR West (for whatever reason). The only JR East units I'm aware of with similar were the 103-3000 units on the Kawagoe line, but they weren't "proper" 103s anyway.

Link to post
disturbman
Posted (edited)

JR East 103-1200 also had partially distributed A/C arrangements. Probably due to having to run-through tunnels.

Edited by disturbman
  • Like 1
Link to post
Dinosbacsi

After a bit of googling and translating random japanese sites, it looks like the Tsurumi Line had some of their 103s like this, with two smaller AC units instead of one bigger.

 

Well I suppose then I'll do the rest of my cars as well and use the non-AC roofs to make it more prototypical for Chuo Sobu. Then maybe get a set of roofs with the AC in the middle if I find some junk for a good price.

Link to post
kami_illy
On 5/2/2021 at 7:02 PM, lukewang01 said:

What wheels are you using to go with the older chassis? I want to reuse some of those chassis and be able to put bogie sides on them.

 

Actually I'll exchange the whole chassis for the T-Kais. The Bandai ones I put now is this one equipped with the high flange wheels. 

 

180421859_kami_illy-b-train25.thumb.jpg.9324215afc7fb15c04824051844789d4.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to post
Dinosbacsi

Talking about Bandai chassises, what are your guys experience with older T trucks versus the newer T-Kai chassises?

 

I'm asking because, as I've wrote about it in my previous posts, my 205 series has T-Kai chassis, while my 103 series has original chassis with replaced T trucks. And my 103 series seems to derail a bit more, compared to the 205, which never has problems. It looks like the older T trucks seem to behave worse when being pushed from behind.

 

For example, as it goes around in my small loop layout, there is a 117mm radius curve where the front car's rear truck will sometimes jump off the rails as the motorized car pushes it from behind. Also if the motorized car is pushing more than 1 trailer cars in front of it, then the couplers will very often uncouple themselves in turns.

 

Interestingly the 205 with the T-Kai chassis does not have this problem. The couplers are a bit different on the T trucks and the T-Kai chassis, I suspect the ones on the T trucks may be an older and worse designs that are more prone to uncoupling when being pushed in tight curves?

Link to post
lukewang01

Old T trucks have a higher resistance. Takes a bit more juice to get them going.

Link to post
bill937ca
On 5/3/2021 at 4:49 PM, Dinosbacsi said:

Decided to try swapping the roofs on my 103 series to the not air-conditioned ones. Mainly because I don't get these other ones, why do they have two AC units on the roof, opposed to the usually only one in the middle?

ABeVvny.jpg

Can't decide yet which one looks better. It looks a bit too plain without the AC unit on the roof, but I don't think these double-AC units are prototypical to the Chuo-Sobu line, are they? Which route may have had their 103s like this?

Going through my files, I came across this source of 103 Series Sobu Line photos circa 2000.

 

https://yoshidahideo.com/data/5000_jr103_soubu.shtml

  • Like 1
Link to post
Dinosbacsi

As I posted in the other thread as well, my newest order finally arrived today with a bunch of Shorty stuff. So yay!

 

For starters there is this beautiful high-cab 103 series. Interestingly it came with a front skirt installed, even though Bandai doesn't even include those for these 103s. I suppose the previous owner was like me and felt they look horrible without one, so bought a set then put them on - and I'm grateful for that, as I think it looks great, even if it's not prototypical at all. And it also came with stickers applied, which is nice. For just 1200 yen I think this was a great purchase.

4vTlvST.jpg

QtNXTe3.jpg

 

Then there was also this EF64-0 series. It just looks so cute, lol. It was a bit more expensive with a 2000 yen price, but it was new - without a box though, but everything still in the small packages and unassembled. So I had the fun of putting it together. I really like the fact that they included a second set of roofs and front cabs so you can make either an older or a newer variant out of it. And also the sticker sheet includes a lot of EF64 running numbers - I wonder which one should I put on, if any?

2uxbVKi.jpg

7EDhHUH.jpg

 

I plan to use it mostly for EMU towing, like they do around the Tokyo area in real life as well. Though in real life the 3 locomotives used for this are EF64-1000 series, not the 0 series like mine, but well... it is what it is. If I already gave up on being completely prorotypical with the 103s front skirts, then I might as well install shibata couplers on this EF64-0 series as well, lol. So I think that's what I will do, anyway.

2A2f8ov.jpg

 

I also got myself this junk 201 series cab car. It came without a chassis and any truck covers, but will be good for spares or experiementing in the future, I suppose. Until then, the EF64 can have some fun towing it around.

HrKvwK9.jpg

K4NVizE.jpg

So my small desk shelf layout suddenly got really crowded, as you can see, but I love it. I love the look of tis small fleet. And the lack of space will stop me from ordering more trains for a while, at least, lol.

  • Like 3
Link to post
disturbman
Posted (edited)

Nice, yellow fleet.

 

Wait until you start putting those away in a nice Casco case. The amount of trains you will have will explode 😉

Edited by disturbman
  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to post
kami_illy
Posted (edited)
2 hours ago, disturbman said:

The amount of trains you will have will explode 😉

 

Oh yeah. Started for me with buying the KeihinTohoku E233 as b-train bc I couldn't afford the Kato/Tomix version at that time (was using all the money that i didn't have to life and eat while doing an internship in Yokohama)... and then a 205 YokohamaLine... and then... you know bc they are cheap, there are a lot (at least back then) and so on. 

And now I shifted from full N-scale to Shorties (almost) entirely!

 

But anyways, welcome down here in the rabbit hole, haha!

 

BTW. I'm loving how the Shorty topic is so alive again these days. Just wish Bandai would do the same and continue producing some...

Edited by kami_illy
Link to post
11 hours ago, disturbman said:

Nice, yellow fleet.

 

Wait until you start putting those away in a nice Casco case. The amount of trains you will have will explode 😉

Thanks. But nah, I'm not the type to put them in a case. If I have them, I prefer them to be on rails. At least it's a deterrent to keep me from buying more, because the "yard" is full. Until I buy more track, that is ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

 

At some point I would like to get a 113 series and a 103-1200 series as well, as those would be more unique, but stil fitting for the Chuo-Sobu theme. There is a nice 103-1200 series up for auction currently, but it's a bit expensive. So I still I will pass for now, I would rather spend on rails, and chassis/motors for the trains I already have. Then hopefully I will find another 103-1200 series in the future as well. They seem to be a bit rare, but they should still emerge from time to time, right?

 

8 hours ago, kami_illy said:

BTW. I'm loving how the Shorty topic is so alive again these days. Just wish Bandai would do the same and continue producing some...

Yes, when I first got into them, I was afraid they were "dead meat" by now and not many people care about them. But happy to see how many people know and enjoy them still. Even in our local Hungarian facebook group I found another member who has a few shorties.

  • Like 1
Link to post

So I got the Kato couplers installed today on my 205 series.

 

I have to say, visually they're great. Just like the pantographs, it's a really big upgrade for really cheap.

UWAazAZ.jpg

K1qXYtO.jpg

As mentioned by someone else previously when we talked about these couplers, they really do come with a small hook under the shibata coupler which keeps the trains together. It's a bit weird looking, also coupling and uncoupling the cars is a real pain with these, you need to do it with a weird twisting motion - but you wouldn't be taking these trains apart every day anyway, so just couple them up once and they're good.

 

However there is an issue. It seems to handle my tight 117mm curves very badly. The couplers have much less free movement in them, as not only do they couple to each other more tightly, but they also move less in their housing. You can see on the picture that their "T" shaped ends that go into the housing are much bigger. So for one they don't fit/need the coupler spring at all, and they also required some cutting on the sides to fit into the housing.

FfVdmQC.jpg

So I think these result in the couplers and the trucks reaching their movement limit in the 117mm curves and that results in the cars lifting or tilting a bit. Because getting into the 117mm curve, the train pretty much always stutters or stops completely. Has anyone had similar issues with these couplers, either with Shorties or normal trains?

 

I wonder if there is any fix to this, because if no, then I'll have to go back to the old couplers.

Link to post

Generally to handle R117 curves Rapido couplers are advised for the play they bring to the train and short trains ideally with two axles because there is more play.  Tight couplers result in car bodies fighting the trucks as they go around curves. R117 is almost tram track.

Edited by bill937ca
Link to post
31 minutes ago, Dinosbacsi said:

I wonder if there is any fix to this,

Having no experience with R117 but if you glue the two parts of each coupler together you can cut the T-shaped end a bit more so they can wiggle in their pockets... I did this with my 500 Shinkansen bc the boogies have almost no room to turn properly.

Link to post
1 hour ago, kami_illy said:

if you glue the two parts of each coupler together you can cut the T-shaped end a bit more so they can wiggle in their pockets... I did this with my 500 Shinkansen bc the boogies have almost no room to turn properly.

Yeah I'll probably try this tomorrow. As mentioned I already had to cut into them a bit to get the cover of the coupler housing to snap back on. And I suppose my cutting wasn't the same each time, as a few of the couplers do have some free movement in their housing, while other ones don't have any. So maybe if I cut some more on those, then they will have a bit more free movement and it will be able to handle the curves - as currently it always gets stuck when the bogey with the non-moving coupler reaches the turn.

Link to post

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...